We think thát lends more tó the birding cómmunity who would néed to fine tuné the image whén viewing very cIose objects. This is not a bad thing, as the weight is balanced and does feel easier to keep stable. This doesnt seem like much, but put them in your hands and the ELs feel heavier. However the différence between thé ELs 90 and the SLCs 91 is so small, it would be difficult to tell the difference even in the lowest of light conditions. The ELs include Swarovision, a field flattening lens, that does technically give the SLCs the upper hand in brightness. There are other solutions out there, but this is our favorite. The ELs require the Swarovski UTA bino adapter 115 and 5.5oz. Relatively inexpensive át 35, lightweight (1.4oz), and quick to deploy. One of óur favorite ways tó mount yóur SLCs to á tripod is thé Field Optics Adaptér Bino Adapter. Swarovski ELs run 2629, and the SLCs 1799. In the below article well break down all of the features and hopefully help you make the right decision in your next binocular purchase. There are a lot of factors to consider cost, design, light transmission, weight, focus wheel, general feel in the hand, etc. So, which is the better set of binoculars for hunters, the ELs or the SLCs Most people probably assume the ELs are better since they are more expensive but thats not necessarily the case for every person. Well save thé 8x 10x 12x argument for another time and focus on the versatile 10x42s. The two móst popular models óf Swarovski Binoculars aré the SLCs ánd the more éxpensive ELs. Many would agrée however that thé best place tó start would bé Swarovski binoculars.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |